Unconscious Bias: Potential vs Performance

The Gender Promotion Gap Isn’t About Performance.

It’s About Perception.

Unconscious bias is one of the most persistent and overlooked barriers to women’s progression in the workplace. It doesn’t always show up as overt discrimination. Often, it appears in more subtle, insidious forms—particularly in how we assess potential.

Recent studies across sectors have revealed a consistent pattern:

🔸 Women are promoted based on proof.

🔸 Men are promoted based on potential.

This isn’t just frustrating. It’s systemic—and it has a tangible impact on who gets noticed, who gets heard, and who rises.

⸻

What the research shows

🔹 A Yale School of Management study found that women are often underestimated by managers, even when their actual performance matches or exceeds that of their male counterparts. (Source in comments below)

🔹 A study by Frontiers in Psychology reports that the language used in appraisals and interviews often reflects this bias. While men are described as “visionary,” “rising stars,” or “natural leaders,” women are more likely to be assessed as “competent” or “reliable.” (Source in comments below)

🔹 A summary of multiple leadership studies shows that women are consistently assessed more critically on their perceived ability to lead, regardless of actual outcomes. (Source in comments below)

🔹 And the BBC adds this insight: “When it comes to hiring and promotion, proof of competence is required of women, while for men, the mere promise is often enough.” (Source in comments below)

⸻

So what does this mean in practice?

It means women are:

• More likely to be asked to “act up” than to be formally promoted.

• More likely to have their ideas appropriated or echoed by male colleagues who are then credited for them.

• Less likely to be sponsored by senior leaders who champion their progression.

• More likely to internalise doubt about their readiness for the next step.

This pattern holds across sectors—including education, where many senior women feel they must over-perform just to be perceived as equally capable.

⸻

This isn’t about blaming individuals. It’s about addressing culture.

Unconscious bias is exactly that—unconscious. But if left unchallenged, it becomes a culture of inequality.

We need to build systems that:

• Use transparent criteria for progression.

• Make sponsorship (not just mentorship) the norm.

• Train leaders to recognise and interrupt bias in talent decisions.

• Normalise inclusive leadership behaviours—like amplifying underrepresented voices, not just noticing them.

⸻

Final thought:

If you are a leader, whatever your sector, you have the opportunity to shape culture.

Let’s stop asking women to prove themselves twice as hard.

Let’s start asking why we haven’t noticed their potential in the first place.

⸻

🤔 Have you seen this dynamic play out in your workplace?

🤔 What could help us shift from bias to balance in how we recognise potential?